> they just want to think it’s not possible As far as I'm aware, what you propose really isn't a solved issue. Most naive approaches you'd think might work are

> they just want to think it’s not possible As far as I'm aware, what you propose really isn't a solved issue. Most naive approaches you'd think might work are either infeasible or give chaotic nonsense results. Partial matching between the output text and the training data is possible as a step after generation (though doesn't determine whether it's coincidence).