3 ms·
It’s not impossible. AI developers can 100% trace node that contribute to a result during the processing of a prompt, therefore they can be attributed. They’ll
by wredue 3y ago
It’s not impossible. AI developers can 100% trace node that contribute to a result during the processing of a prompt, therefore they can be attributed.
They’ll never do this, of course, cause they’re riding high on wins of stupid people pushing “you can’t work backward from a result to find the nodes” (which is probably somewhat grounded in reality).
Attribution is absolutely not impossible, they just want to think it’s not possible, because enabling such a thing would show just how egregious the copying actually is.
- Ukv 3y ago> they just want to think it’s not possible As far as I'm aware, what you propose really isn't a solved issue. Most naive approaches you'd think might work are either infeasible or give chaotic nonsense results. Partial matching between the output text and the training data is possible as a step after generation (though doesn't determine whether it's coincidence).