3 ms·
Then what we need isn't open source. It's something else. Maybe called "Open Model?"
by stcredzero 3y ago
Then what we need isn't open source. It's something else. Maybe called "Open Model?"
- belval 3y agoYes that would make sense. I'm in no way arguing that models can't be more open, just that overloading a commonly used expression such as "open-source" and then complaining that projects are not complying with your new definition of open-source just does not make sense to me.