3 ms·
This is what baffled me. The claim that access restrictions are justified because they enable peer reviews is absurd given that peer review is entirely a non-pr
by eyeundersand 3y ago
This is what baffled me. The claim that access restrictions are justified because they enable peer reviews is absurd given that peer review is entirely a non-profit exercise.
- red_admiral 3y agoIndeed. It looks to me more like some for-profit journals and other "gatekeepers" are worried that people could run academia just as well without them.
- systems_glitch 3y agomgmt sees their positions threatened.