3 ms·
What do you like about it? Compared to GPT-3.5, Claude Instant seems to be the same or worse in quality according to both human and automated benchmarks, but al
by coder543 3y ago
What do you like about it? Compared to GPT-3.5, Claude Instant seems to be the same or worse in quality according to both human and automated benchmarks, but also more expensive. It seems undifferentiated. And I would rather use Mixtral than either of those in most cases, since Mixtral often outperforms GPT-3.5 and can be run on my own hardware.
- avereveard 3y agoData extraction mostly. Supports long document, cheaper input tokens than gpt3 turbo, and when I ask to stick to document informations it doesn't try to fill in gaps out with his trained knowledge. Sure you can't have a chat with it or expect it to do high level reasoning, but has enough to do the basic deductions for grounded answers.