3 ms·
I also don't think it's out of style if you have a .Net monolith. It's already there; there's no need to include or install anything. So people use it. It's a l
by brodo 3y ago
I also don't think it's out of style if you have a .Net monolith. It's already there; there's no need to include or install anything. So people use it. It's a little too much magic for my taste, but people like magic.
- SideburnsOfDoom 3y agoIn my experience in .NET recently, Inversion of Control containers are as popular as ever; typically just using the one that's "already there". But it's the "config as a XML file" that is right out of style, in favour of config as code, for the reasons given.
- daxfohl 3y agoHaving moved from .net to java recently, I have to say I miss the .net IoC ecosystem; things are simple and to the point, and you use the tools however best fits your use cases. In Java-land everything is Guice, which is more of a "framework"; it requires a lot more boilerplate and you have to design around it, and gets in your way any time you want to do anything outside of its golden path.