24 ms·
I don't think that's equivalent. If you buy a Ford car, you aren't forced to buy tires from the Ford dealership. You're not a "Ford Customer" beholden to the Fo
by seandoe 3y ago
I don't think that's equivalent. If you buy a Ford car, you aren't forced to buy tires from the Ford dealership. You're not a "Ford Customer" beholden to the Ford Motor Company when it comes to everything related to the car. If you buy a Dell desktop you aren't forced to buy all software through a Dell marketplace. I'm sure if these companies could, they would, and apple can and so they do. But is that the world we want? Sure, in a totally "free" market apple should be able to do want ever they want. But are we more interested in freedom for corporations or freedom for people? Would things be better for everyone if we used the power of government to prevent these anticompetitive practices? Why can't apple offer good reason for iPhone users to buy software through their marketplace and take the 30%, all the while allowing users to choose to download software outside of the marketplace?
- robertjpayne 3y agoThis is rapidly changing with Tesla first. Outside the tires not much you're going to get after-market except from Tesla. You always have the option to not buy a ford, or not buy an iPhone.
- cryptonym 3y agoThat's true and is not something most people are happy with. This model is being pushed on us by billionaires.
- smoldesu 3y agoAnd you're convinced that this is good for us?
- rustcleaner 3y agoWe have the option to make the laws such that this cute little rent-extracting business model you defend gets companies who follow it shut down for being criminal enterprises.