3 ms·
I disagree. UEFI makes my life, as an end user, so much easier. The amount of times I've needed to buy a different flash drive because the BIOS of a particular
by jeroenhd 3y ago
I disagree. UEFI makes my life, as an end user, so much easier. The amount of times I've needed to buy a different flash drive because the BIOS of a particular motherboard didn't like the way my existing flash drives smelled has gone down to 0. The thing even supports filesystems _not_ formatted by a tool written for Windows 95 that arranges the FAT partition in _just_ the right way to get it recognised.
Previously, we had motherboards do the same stuff, except now they called into ROM memory on the network card, and ran a bunch of non-standard, proprietary code to render the fancy graphics and do online updating. I don't believe for a second that things were easier before UEFI standardised it all, they were just hidden from plain view better.
- p_l 3y agoIt helps that unlike with BIOS, the modern tooling doesn't have huge amounts of "we never read the spec but it booted on my machine" that was prevalent even with grub2. TL;DR a BIOS doesn't have to boot a drive if there's no primary partition marked "active", no matter whether your boot code uses that or not.