I agree, but a vague abstract model is still a model. the model is a model for what happen while you're alive, why you are alive, and what happen after you're a

I agree, but a vague abstract model is still a model. the model is a model for what happen while you're alive, why you are alive, and what happen after you're alive. this vagueness is a feature of surviving religions the more details you add the more your predictions become falsifiable. this leave room to theologians to speculate and when they are wrong it's not the religions that false it's the person who made that specific inference and when it's right, well it was already written. this is not an /r/atheism checkmate post just pointing out the evolutionary dynamics, since even if there was a religion that described things in great details and all of it were true the people at its inception would just violently reject it without expanding efforts to verify the claims, since they don't have the means. for example image you go thousand(s) years in the past and preach the standard model (lets ignore all the pesky details about how you'll probably die or become a slave regardless of ethnicity since you have no social backing in the era).