3 ms·
No one would look at a veracrypt archive containing a copyrighted work and confuse it either. They look very different to the original files but both the encryp
by eigenket 3y ago
No one would look at a veracrypt archive containing a copyrighted work and confuse it either. They look very different to the original files but both the encrypted file and the learning model's weights allow one to reproduce the copyrighted work.
- s1artibartfast 3y agoNot falling back to the argument that the output is infringing, not the archive. If the archive can't produce the original work, it's not infringing. If you printed the binary of Harry Potter and sold it as a painting, that would be fair use. It doesn't matter if the data is encoded in it, if it is not used for extraction. Think of Andy warhol's Campbell Soup. Nobody is going to confuse the art for a can of soup and try to eat it. That's not being sold as a label for other soups. However, the original Campbell Soup data is absolutely encoded there.