Ignorance, confusion, incompetence, neglect. Most of those are "your fault." We all make jokes about "stupid users" as these are responsible for thinking for t

Ignorance, confusion, incompetence, neglect. Most of those are "your fault." We all make jokes about "stupid users" as these are responsible for thinking for themselves. LLM however literally produces and conveys formed "thoughts". Due to the variance of minds and the nature of consumer society some consider bad LLM negligent on behave of their creator. This interpretation is philosophical such that one side (which I agree with, Randian and all) says stupid is as stupid does and individuals are wholly responsible for what they do based on any input (LLM, encouragable friend, or otherwise), and other sides believe civilization only stands where party's influencing one and other (for commercial purposes particularly) are in some way responsible for accuracy and socially stable influence. Who's right? The real question is, which world do you want to live in? One supporting darwinian competence or social standards? Linux is only a tool that does what you tell it. LLM is a tool which people may do what it tells them.