You're dismissing my comment because of what someone else said upthread? I hate the desire to meta-comment about the site rather than argue on the merits. We

You're dismissing my comment because of what someone else said upthread? I hate the desire to meta-comment about the site rather than argue on the merits. We obviously don't know so much about how courts will interpret copyright with LLMs. There's a lot of arguments on all sides, and we're only going to know in several years after a whole lot of case law solidifies. There are so many questions, (fair use, originality, can weights be copyrighted? when can model output be copyrighted? etc etc etc). Not to mention that the legislative branch may weigh in. This discourse by citizens who are informed about technology is essential for technology to be regulated well, even if not all participants in the conversation are as legally informed as you'd wish. Today's well-meaning intuition about what deserves copyright and why inform tomorrow's case law and legislation.