> There’s no world in which Nintendo and apple are colluding to set rates. What makes you say that? And short of direct collusion, is it fair game if Apple set

> There’s no world in which Nintendo and apple are colluding to set rates. What makes you say that? And short of direct collusion, is it fair game if Apple sets the precedent and Nintendo follows suit without direct coordination? If the agreement is only alluded to without being directly stated, are we okay with the ethical precedent regardless of legal standing?