4 ms·
The constitution is clear that copyright is not "just;" it is a concession for the sole purpose of promoting "the Progress of Science and useful Arts," whose "u
by MacsHeadroom 3y ago
The constitution is clear that copyright is not "just;" it is a concession for the sole purpose of promoting "the Progress of Science and useful Arts," whose "unnatural restriction of natural rights must be carefully balanced."
The fact that "research, technological advancement, and construction would proceed much more quickly" without copyright is exactly why abolishing copyright is the just and correct thing to do.
- Vegenoid 3y ago“The constitution” is certainly not in favor of abolishing copyright, as it explicitly provides for its legality and usefulness. I am not sure where the “unnatural restriction” quote comes from, could you illuminate me? As far as what the constitution says about copyright, it seems only to say that it is “To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts”