3 ms·

Certain games are better as a subscription, those that are multiplayer with game connection features. Others shouldn't be, like single player story lines. I do

• bmitc 3y ago
  > Certain games are better as a subscription, those that are multiplayer with game connection features. Not necessarily. See Overwatch 2.
• Log_out_ 3y ago
  In theory, if there is a market and you can vote for better features/ideas with money. In practice they try to subvert and hack the players with loot boxes, dark patterns and pay to win or overpriced cosmetics.
  • tracker1 3y ago
    Of course... I mainly mean games in the vein of say WoW, RuneScape and the like where you're playing against an environment and other players, or otherwise matching with similarly skilled players. Etc. Not that they wouldn't use patterns mentioned on top of subscriptions. But that isn't necessary. Ongoing development and ongoing play as a focus. If, for example, Quake 3 Arena was a subscription model and ongoing development was happening, more maps, okay styles etc. I might still be subscribed to such a thing.