3 ms·
It’s quite different. The incident with the door heavily implies a problem of airplane design. It makes sense to ground it. What we knew at the time of the fir
by tomca32 3y ago
It’s quite different. The incident with the door heavily implies a problem of airplane design. It makes sense to ground it.
What we knew at the time of the first crash of max 8 seemed to imply a pilot error. It wasn’t statistically significant. Only when another max 8 crashed soon after (I think soon enough to say “in a row”) was the max 8 grounded. If the second crash occured years after it wouldnt be significant.