3 ms·
Yeah, definitely. But for a fair comparison I think you have to look at how .NET did things before async/await hit the scene. And, for that, the aspect of the d
by bunderbunder 3y ago
Yeah, definitely. But for a fair comparison I think you have to look at how .NET did things before async/await hit the scene. And, for that, the aspect of the design in question is quite similar between the two.
- josefx 3y agoEarly .Net is hardly an independent data point from early Java. Not only was .Net directly influenced by Java, it also had to support a direct migration from the Microsoft JVM specific Visual J++ to J#. The handful of languages I know either do not have a top level object class that supports a randomized set of features ( C++ ) or prioritize a completely different way of concurrent execution ( Python, JavaScript ).