> If having those restrictions makes the world worse overall, then it would be ethical to remove them Worse how? As defined by whom? You could make a pretty c

> If having those restrictions makes the world worse overall, then it would be ethical to remove them Worse how? As defined by whom? You could make a pretty compelling argument that "the world" would be better off by, e.g., forcing cancer patients through drug trials against their will. We basically could speed run a cure to cancer! These longtermist, ends justify the means, ideas can easily turn extremely gross.