3 ms·
You specifically speculated that it is "population replacement on the planet-scale" which is not only simplistic to the point of being untrue, but also referenc
by standardUser 3y ago
You specifically speculated that it is "population replacement on the planet-scale" which is not only simplistic to the point of being untrue, but also references language widely used by people and organizations who oppose migration specifically due to racial concerns.
If you ever want to have a reasonable, productive conversation about immigration, don't use words like 'replacement' that almost everyone knows are racially charged.
And by the way I upvoted your original comment for visibility because I believe these issues should be discussed openly.
- randomopining 3y agoCool, and thanks. I think my comment is completely reasonable and obv it started some decent discussions. Replacement is defined as "a person or thing that takes the place of another"... when a town has 100 people who are German, and then in the future it is 50 Germans and 50 French -- the Germans have been half replaced by the French. It's a simple term, and I'm using it 100% as it is defined in our English language.