3 ms·
I'm surprised to see perplexity's 70B online model score so low on model quality and somehow far worse mixtral and gpt3.5(they use a fine tuned gpt3.5 as the fo
by binsquare 3y ago
I'm surprised to see perplexity's 70B online model score so low on model quality and somehow far worse mixtral and gpt3.5(they use a fine tuned gpt3.5 as the foundational model AFAIK)
I run https://www.labophase.com https://www.labophase.com and my data suggests that it's one of the top 3 models in terms of users liking to interact with it. May I know how model quality is benchmarked to understand this discrepancy?
- Gcam 3y agoModel quality index methodology is as per this comment (can add perplexity using the dropdown): https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39014985#39017632 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39014985#39017632 It's a combination of different quality metrics which have Perplexity, overall, not performing as well. That being said, I think we are in the very early stages of model quality scoring/ranking - and (for closed sourced models) we are seeing frequent changes. Will be interesting to see how measures evolve / model ranks change