3 ms·
> You're just mirroring the parent example. Prior to AI (or even computers), this was a problem. Not at all, and your argument isn't the same thing. The probl
by hn_throwaway_99 3y ago
> You're just mirroring the parent example. Prior to AI (or even computers), this was a problem.
Not at all, and your argument isn't the same thing.
The problem with current AI, which is very different from past forms of automation, is that, essentially, its failure mode is undefined. Past forms of automation, for example, did not "hallucinate" seemingly correct but false answers. Even taking your own example, it was obvious to your colleagues that they didn't know how to get the answer. So they did the correct thing - they went to someone who knew how to do it. What they did not do, and which is what most current AI solutions will do, is just "wing it" with a solution that is wrong but looks correct to those without more expertise.
- williamcotton 3y ago“Since when is failure mode being undefined a new thing?” - C programmer
- hn_throwaway_99 3y agoThis is the same bad argument made in a sibling comment. Undefined behavior in C is actually strictly defined: if you want to avoid undefined behavior, don't do stuff the spec specifically says results in undefined behavior, like deference a null pointer. Writing up a set of rules to guard against undefined behavior (which is a primary job of a C developer) is simply not possible with an LLM.