4 ms·
This is absolutely not true. Here is an article where ars technica tried it https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2023/12/ny-times-sues-open-ai-microsoft-over-co
by eigenket 3y ago
This is absolutely not true. Here is an article where ars technica tried it
https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2023/12/ny-times-sues-open-ai-microsoft-over-copyright-infringement/ https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2023/12/ny-times-sues-op...
And this is a screenshot of their session whith copilot
https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/Screen-Shot-2023-12-27-at-12.11.54-PM.png https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/Scree...
- jdiff 3y agoThis does not match what GP claimed, that when prompted with the start of an article, GPT 3 (mostly) faithfully completes it. The original article also claimed that it seemed to have been patched shortly after publication.
- eigenket 3y agoIt does match exactly what I claimed and it also states that even though the behavior was patched in GPT the ars people were able to easily reproduce it in copilot. Its funny that the behavior was patched if OpenAI believes it isn't copyright infringement.