> I don't think any person who actually has worked on anything creative in their life would compare a personal style to a model that can output in nearly any st

> I don't think any person who actually has worked on anything creative in their life would compare a personal style to a model that can output in nearly any style at extreme speeds. And even if you're inspired by a specific author, invariably what happens is it becomes mix of yourself + those influences, not a damn near-copy. I don't think anyone who has ever read a novel in their life would say that an AI can write literature at all, in any style. > not a damn near-copy. The obvious solution is to just treat it as if a human did it. If you did not know the authorship of the output and thought it was a human, would you still consider it copyright infringement? If yes, fair enough. If no, then i think is clearly not a "damn near-copy"