3 ms·
I'm not sure how to feel about this, ultimately any work you put on the internet can be used in a way to enrichen other people. If you write free software, if y
by theLiminator 3y ago
I'm not sure how to feel about this, ultimately any work you put on the internet can be used in a way to enrichen other people. If you write free software, if you write a poem, if you draw art, etc. People will be free to heavily copy or be inspired by your work (and the distinction between copy and inspire is very muddy/gray).
The real question is about the scale and how "original" ai works are. Does generative ai enabling this at scale make it different than humans doing it? Is there something special about human authorship?
I personally don't care if my open source code gets trained on by AI, but I'm not sure about the social contract around artistic expression.
- itronitron 3y agoLet's say I develop an AI that is trained on all of the software IDEs in existence and then make the AI available for people to generate their own IDE from a set of prompts, like "jetbrains python" or "visual studio". As the developer of the AI model am I at all accountable if people use specific prompts to generate copycats of proprietary IDEs?