3 ms·
It’s a terrible argument and a terrible loop hole. It’s perfectly legal to hire someone to write in the copied style of Terry. So even if your desired system w
by jncfhnb 3y ago
It’s a terrible argument and a terrible loop hole. It’s perfectly legal to hire someone to write in the copied style of Terry.
So even if your desired system were implemented to a T, you could hire someone to write a dozen or so examples of Terry writing. Probably just 30 or so pages of highly styled copied text, and then train your bot on this corpus to make “Not Terry” content. Boom. $100 on gig author and then for all practical purposes the Terry style is legally open source. Terry doesn’t even get the $100!
- danaris 3y agoThey've specifically proposed that there be a legal distinction drawn between "done by a human" and "done by an automated process." Saying "a-HA! But my automated process can produce something that looks much like what your human would!" does not negate that; it merely makes it hard to tell the difference at a glance—which we already know to be the case.
- jncfhnb 3y agoThat doesn’t follow the thread of conversation here at all.