3 ms·
> but on the personal scale I can't only trust the average That is simply personal bias and has little to do with reality. The basis of e.g. the scientific met
by margorczynski 3y ago
> but on the personal scale I can't only trust the average
That is simply personal bias and has little to do with reality. The basis of e.g. the scientific method is rejecting what you "trust" or not when having good quality statistical information which suggest something else.
> An LLM without question can be better than a human much of the time, but the errors, while more rare, can be worse than human error due to the lack of contextual reasoning and general intelligence.
Do you maybe have anything to support this claim or is this simply your personal feeling/belief?
- micromacrofoot 3y agoPersonal bias is my reality. I trust that skydiving is safer than driving, but I'm still going to scream when I jump out of the plane. Anecdotally I use LLMs every single day, and almost every single day it makes a silly error that many humans would not make because it's not continually reasoning or interacting with reality. Until I see these silly mistakes go away, I will always work alongside it to verify output. I'm not giving it the wheel of my car anytime soon.