This is a blatant mischaracterization. There is a legal formation of a union according to US law which requires voting. That's not what I'm talking about. There

This is a blatant mischaracterization. There is a legal formation of a union according to US law which requires voting. That's not what I'm talking about. There can be collective negotiation where all employees can simply threaten to quit if demands aren't met. The government doesn't have to legally acknowledge your union hence why I used the term "legal definition of union" This isn't some cooking eggs and not calling it frying. This is more you not understanding. Failure to comprehend and being mean is what's going on with you. The term is ass hole. Because let's face it, there's no failure to comprehend here, just deliberate pedantism and mischaracterization. https://www.nlrb.gov/about-nlrb/rights-we-protect/the-law/employees/your-right-to-form-a-union https://www.nlrb.gov/about-nlrb/rights-we-protect/the-law/em... It is this legal definition of a union that has the ability to characterize your membership in the legal union as having paid union dues. This legal formation of a union which is required to even sue the company isn't required for employees to act collectively. But you know this. It's obvious. Stop being deliberately pedantic. Just move on man.