I meam, accusations of bias aside, he's making points about both parties' statements of facts, isn't he? On one side, you have one party citing thousands of de

I meam, accusations of bias aside, he's making points about both parties' statements of facts, isn't he? On one side, you have one party citing thousands of dead children, countless civilian targets getting shelled, and ministers and soldiers making explicit statements that they want to wipe out the people of Gaza and take their lands. On the other, the Israeli state saying those children were child soldiers, and the numbers are probably fake (but we won't let journalists in to make any kind of estimate), and all those civilian targets were actually military, hospitals and journalists and all, and all the public officials calling for genocide didn't really mean it. Maybe Mr Murray's account is omitting some points or bending the truth or wrong about the truthfulness of some claims, in which case I'd appreciate factual rebuttals. But otherwise, I think he makes a pretty good point that the Israeli delegation is full of shit, and the SA delegation is right to call this the beginning of a genocide.