> But nobody should be developing AGI without incredibly robustly proven alignment, open or closed, any more than people should be developing nuclear weapons in

> But nobody should be developing AGI without incredibly robustly proven alignment, open or closed, any more than people should be developing nuclear weapons in their garage. > Because AI safety people are not the strawmen you are hypothesizing You yourself are literally the living strawman. > If you want to argue, concretely and with evidence, why you think it isn't an existential risk No, you are the one advocating for draconian laws and bans. It is your responsibility to prove the potential danger.