>They're arguing against taking existential risks. AI being a laundering operation for copyright violations is certainly a problem. It's not an existential risk

>They're arguing against taking existential risks. AI being a laundering operation for copyright violations is certainly a problem. It's not an existential risk. Give an example of an "existential risk". An AI somehow getting out of control and acting with agency to exterminate humanity? An AI getting advanced enough to automate the work of the majority of the population and cause unprecedented mass unemployment? What exactly are we talking about here? I'm actually a lot more concerned about REAL risks like copyright uncertainty, like automating important decisions such as mortgage approvals and job hires without a human in the loop, and like the enshittening of the Internet with fake AI-generated content than I am about sci-fi fantasy scenarios.