3 ms·
I don't know why the PyPA seems to be stubbornly ignoring Poetry, most Python devs I know have switched to it and are very unlikely to switch again to something
by drcongo 3y ago
I don't know why the PyPA seems to be stubbornly ignoring Poetry, most Python devs I know have switched to it and are very unlikely to switch again to something else. It does what you need it to do, it's stable and reliable these days, and the ergonomics are good.
- Hackbraten 3y agoI wish Poetry were PEP-621 compliant though. [1] Currently, it uses a proprietary configuration group (or "tool section", as they seem to call it in `pyproject.toml` speech). [1]: https://github.com/python-poetry/roadmap/issues/3 https://github.com/python-poetry/roadmap/issues/3
- drcongo 3y agoI kinda wish PEP-621 had gone more down the pyproject route that poetry took, their version looks so much cleaner and more readable at a glance than the PEP-621 version.
- nerdponx 3y agoHatch seems to be the preferred tool by PyPA, probably because it's more standards-compliant and it claims standards-compliance as a design goal.