> Because AI safety people are not the strawmen you are hypothesizing. They're arguing against taking existential risks. The AI safety strawman is "existential

> Because AI safety people are not the strawmen you are hypothesizing. They're arguing against taking existential risks. The AI safety strawman is "existential risk from magical super-God AI". That is what the unserious "AI safety" grifters or sci-fi enthusiasts are discussing. The real AI safety risks are the ones that actually exist today: training-set biases extended to decision-making biases, deeply personalized propaganda, plagiarism white-washing, creative works bankrupting, power imbalances from control of working AI tech etc.