3 ms·

That sort of what happens, there is just a configurable hard limit on how much new thread may be created that was hit by this benchmark. As mentioned in anothe

• Groxx 3y ago
  Is there no limit (ignoring outside limits, e.g. from the OS) for normal threads? I know people usually use limited size thread pools for a variety of reasons, but I can't say that I've actually tried to exceed limits in a Java process yet... That would indeed be a problem if it's not similarly unlimited by default. Configurable makes perfect sense, as does attempting to be conservative, but small hard-capped defaults are very obviously going to cause problems, especially while synchronized locks the carrier.
  • Groxx 3y ago
    Since it's too late to edit, Java docs say: >The maximum number of platform threads available to the scheduler. It defaults to 256. Yeah, that's pretty small. >256 simultaneous synchronized calls doesn't seem particularly extreme, given how common its use is. Tho now I wonder if you can just set this to max-int and resume like normal, or if giant values do awful things internally...