3 ms·

So instead of spending $0 on not having that employee, the company would rather hire than employee for $50k to get back $25k in tax savings? This doesn't seem

by acchow 3y ago

So instead of spending $0 on not having that employee, the company would rather hire than employee for $50k to get back $25k in tax savings? This doesn't seem like a profit-driven decision.

lnxg33k1 3y ago
The thing is $25k of software production is left at the company, and when the employee is not needed anymore, then the collectivity has to pay for unemployment
kthejoker2 3y ago
That $0 is on a day by day basis. "Riding the bench" in between project bookings is common, especially for junior consultants with limited skills. Bench / sub 100% utilization is one reason consultants cost so much.