3 ms·
Not only that, an important thing to consider as the besieging force was to have at least triple the numbers of the garrison defending the castle.[1] So if a c
by Dalewyn 3y ago
Not only that, an important thing to consider as the besieging force was to have at least triple the numbers of the garrison defending the castle.[1]
So if a castle was garrisoned by a defending force of 2,000, you wanted at least 6,000 men as the besieging force to even stand a chance of winning the siege whether through killing or attrition.
And this quickly grows exponentially for the besiegers as the defending force becomes bigger: If the defenders numbered 5,000 men, you wanted 15,000 men as the besiegers.
So not only did the besiegers have a harder time fighting compared to the defenders, the logistical requirements and demands for the besiegers was significantly larger than anything the defenders had to deal with.
[1]: https://www.quora.com/How-large-of-an-army-unit-in-medieval-times-is-needed-for-a-siege-attack-1 https://www.quora.com/How-large-of-an-army-unit-in-medieval-...
- persnickety 3y agoNitpick: you mean that it grows linearly, not exponentially.