8 ms·
The reason is pretty easy: You understand the value of your workers better than a random employer, because they work here. You know when someone is a bust, and
by ta_1138 3y ago
The reason is pretty easy: You understand the value of your workers better than a random employer, because they work here. You know when someone is a bust, and when someone is a star player. If you don't give raises to your best people, they are the ones that quit first, and when people quit, they don't quit one at a time: If I get a major raise by changing youbs, you can bet all the coworkers that I respect will hear about it, and I'll want to take them with me.
I suspect that losing a high percentage of your best employees all at once because you are paying them quite a bit less than what you'd pay a worse replacement is a bad thing you want to avoid.
- ozr 3y agoI agree. High performers should be recognized via whatever process the company has to do so. Leveling, at reviews, etc. The lack of doing that is just shitty management. It doesn't change the basic description of the market above.