4 ms·
“If there a difference between another human acting a character vs a model?” Yes. One is an actual living, breathing human who uses their lived experience in o
by sundaeofshock 3y ago
“If there a difference between another human acting a character vs a model?”
Yes. One is an actual living, breathing human who uses their lived experience in order to bring nuance and feeling to their performance.
The other is a machine.
- itake 3y agook? what is wrong with a machine (or the DS that collected the data and trained the model based on their own lived experience) having a performance? I don't see why one is ok but not the other.
- sundaeofshock 3y agoThe sum total of a life can’t be reduced to an algorithm. We are so much more than that! A human actor brings the sum of their life to each role. Joy, anger, fear, sadness; these can’t be felt by an LLM running on an Nvida chip in some random data center. Our humanity matters, and it saddens me that you don’t seem to share that belief.
- eska 3y agoMost voice recordings are not for artistic purposes. I feel you’re falling for a false choice fallacy, because there’s a world for both kinds of performances. Furthermore small companies without a budget are enabled to create things now that they were not able to do before because they don’t have the money for many voice actors for multiple languages. Even large companies may prototype things and create placeholder recordings.