3 ms·
Oh so words were charged indiviually. That's strange but ok. So that means if you could hypothetically serialize/compress the whole data set into one word you'd
by INTPenis 3y ago
Oh so words were charged indiviually. That's strange but ok. So that means if you could hypothetically serialize/compress the whole data set into one word you'd be most cost effective.
- ale42 3y agoBut as said before, it looks like words were limited to 10 letters. So you could encode/compress a bit, but not a long message into a single 243-letters word...
- thaumasiotes 3y ago> But as said before, it looks like words were limited to 10 letters. On average or individually? A cap of 10 letters doesn't really make sense if you're specifically allowing Latin to be charged by the word.
- lmm 3y agoYou get charged some multiple of sum([ceil(length(word) / 10) for word in words]), plus a flat base fee. At least that's how it was the last time I sent a telegram.