Scrum is basically a set of necessary but not sufficient processes. I was sceptical about it, took the course, and aced the test. Scrum itself is like the rule

Scrum is basically a set of necessary but not sufficient processes. I was sceptical about it, took the course, and aced the test. Scrum itself is like the rules for holding a good meeting. It's good common sense advice that I don't think you can actually reasonably object to. If it's not in the Scrum guide, it's not Scrum, truly find something objectionable in that: https://scrumguides.org/scrum-guide.html https://scrumguides.org/scrum-guide.html But in achieving that flawesseness, they made it so broad and vague that you really need to add additional practices to it. And then you got to be careful, mature, and thoughtful or else it's gonna turn into a shitshow... but if you just do Scrum you'll end up as a shitshow anyway. PS- to me personally the biggest flaw is that so much hinges on the definition of done being correct, and that is at least half the battle in dev and can almost single handedly save or sink an organisation in itself.