3 ms·
You are completely missing the point. I would too use language the reciever understands in order to be understood. Me and others pointed out how it was framed a
by bdhcuidbebe 3y ago
You are completely missing the point. I would too use language the reciever understands in order to be understood. Me and others pointed out how it was framed and how does it add anything to the story mentioning that their partner dont understand things, thats the condescending part.
- pests 3y agoI think you are missing the point. This post introduces an interesting analogy for something technical. A commentor says they used a similar analogy on their non-technical girlfriend. How is that not relevant? Also, how is mentioning someone doesn't understand something condensending? "I was teaching my friend, who isn't a rocket scientist, about orbital mechanics" That is not an insult or anything towards my friend. It's not condescending. It's okay for someone to not know something. Esp complex or technical topics.