4 ms·
Here's Layne Norton's response to Lustig and that exact Huberman episode: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LZPKTaVB1IU https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LZPKTaVB1I
by hombre_fatal 3y ago
Here's Layne Norton's response to Lustig and that exact Huberman episode: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LZPKTaVB1IU https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LZPKTaVB1IU
It'll answer your question.
- Etheryte 3y agoSurely you can provide a better summary than just linking to a video that's an hour long. No one is gonna watch all that on your "trust me bro".
- SketchySeaBeast 3y ago> No one is gonna watch all that on your "trust me bro". I see you've never met the UFO/UAP community.
- sideshowb 3y agoAre these people unable to write?
- phatfish 3y agoYou don't "go viral" writing something.
- sideshowb 3y agoI guess on the plus side the medium acts as a good bs filter.
- justnotworthit 3y agoWriting or video production?
- ovi256 3y ago[dead]
- lustig_reader 3y agoI find Layne unconvincing, and in fact many of his links in the supposed debunking do not speak to the point: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-hnlCHsVjiLH6aQoj4gU-j7niNYMvxHLOMg1JzDarFw/edit https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-hnlCHsVjiLH6aQoj4gU-j7n... He's a poor debater in that video, and he's begging the question in many cases. He actually agrees with Lustig that highly processed food is addictive (he gives different reasons), but he pretends to disagree (go virality!). He's inventing strawmen in order to have something to argue with. They are actually making the same prescription but for different reasons: eat less processed food and reduce caloric intake if you want to lose weight. He agrees that fruit is harder to consume, and is therefore a better vehicle to consume fructose if one is trying to limit caloric intake. There are lots of papers https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0149763421002761 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S01497...