> This is a really, really high bar. For example, on surface streets, this means the system on its own is capable of driving at least 100k miles without propert

> This is a really, really high bar. For example, on surface streets, this means the system on its own is capable of driving at least 100k miles without property damage and 40M miles without fatality. The system can still have flaws, but virtually all of those problems must result in a lack of progress, rather than collision or injury This is a weird way to think of it, I don't actually think of it as statistics. The failure cases will be different (between human and AI). Further, we want to be able to sue those responsible (not some nameless company). Final thought, I wonder if this is the metric, when we'll start seeing insurance remove humans or increase the premiums. Basically, exponentially driving everyone into AI driving