It's a bit of a wild interpretation that the author claims that making driving unpleasant is an effective way of reducing carbon emissions. The second quote se

It's a bit of a wild interpretation that the author claims that making driving unpleasant is an effective way of reducing carbon emissions. The second quote seems more a wry observation from someone who has disdain for wealthy people. And of course you can cherry pick the one or two positive notes from the article but then you'd have to ignore: > the CO2 emissions from fuel production and combustion are not praiseworthy > Nobody in their right mind would propose a switch to cars fuelled by plastic waste. > The car is not a pleasure to drive, at least not regularly. It is dirty. Its interior stinks of plastic, which cannot be healthy I'm not sure how this could be an overall endorsement.