> Low-tech or traditional methods don’t mean they’re inherently better for the climate or environment though How is this in contradiction with what I'm saying?

> Low-tech or traditional methods don’t mean they’re inherently better for the climate or environment though How is this in contradiction with what I'm saying? To quote my own post: > Low-Tech Magazine's niche is low tech self-sufficiency Neither I nor the writer of TFA think the venn diagram of low-tech self-sufficiency and environmentalism is a perfect circle, and that should be pretty obvious. > it’s also not a good thing to encourage even in a hobby sense That's not what TFA is doing. Do you really think there's going to be any consequential amount of people taking this up after reading the article? Maybe a few hackers will think it's fun, but the article spends a lot of time emphasizing how undesirable this idea is in practice.