4 ms·

ChatGPT-3.5 or ChatGPT-4? There is a big difference. For fun, I just asked ChatGPT-4 to generate a normalized database representation of vcard information: htt

• account-5 3y ago
  Chatgpt 3.5. Maybe I should pay for a couple of months access to 4 to see the difference. Is it worth the money?
  • coder543 3y ago
    ChatGPT-3.5 isn’t even worth touching as an end-user application. Bard is better (due to having some integrations), but it’s still barely useful. ChatGPT-4 is on an another level entirely compared to either 3.5 or Bard. It is actually useful for a lot. ChatGPT-3.5 can still serve a purpose when you’re talking about API automations where you provide all the data in the prompt and have ChatGPT-3.5 help with parsing or transforming it, but not as a complete chat application on its own. Given the bad experiences ChatGPT-3.5 gives out on a regular basis as a chat application, I don’t even know why OpenAI offers it for free. It seems like a net-negative for ChatGPT/OpenAI’s reputation. I think it is worth paying for a month of ChatGPT-4. Some people get more use out of it than others, so it may not be worth it to you to continue, but it’s hard for anyone to know just how big of a difference ChatGPT-4 represents when they haven’t used it. I provided a sample of ChatGPT-4’s output in my previous response, so you can compare that to your experiences with ChatGPT-3.5.
    • account-5 3y ago
      You sample completely blows away what I got out of 3.5. I'm now wondering if Bing is 3.5 or 4. But will likely fork out for a couple of months.