3 ms·
Doing a bit of searching led me to: https://darklantern.proboards.com/post/16119 https://darklantern.proboards.com/post/16119 https://acousticsfirst.info/tag/
by scrlk 3y ago
Doing a bit of searching led me to:
https://darklantern.proboards.com/post/16119 https://darklantern.proboards.com/post/16119
https://acousticsfirst.info/tag/ken-fritz https://acousticsfirst.info/tag/ken-fritz
> The general thoughts that went into the overall plan in designing this room was to accommodate not only audio but video. The acoustic plan was to eliminate as many parallel surfaces as possible. The side walls are skewed out by 2” from front to back to help reduce slap echos. Both the front and the back of the room incorporate a curve design that would help scatter sound. I replicated the ceiling design from a concert hall in Osaka, Japan. The ceiling to floor dimension at the front of the room, 11.5 feet, expanded in five different planes to 17.5 feet at the rear of the room.
> Acoustic testing was then done by a Richmond company, “Acoustics First”. ETF measurements were taken and sound panels were then designed according to a patented algorithm. The panels were then built by Owens Corning according to prescribed specification.
- mindslight 3y agoThank you! These links paint a much different picture than the WaPo story, which is bordering on dishonest with phrasings such as "$1M stereo" and "modest split-level ranch". From these links, this project seems to be more appropriately described as a fancy and bespoke DIY home renovation. That wide two story shot looks quite gorgeous, independent of all the acoustic treatment. And yeah it is a sad fact that if you do extensive customization to your house the market doesn't really care, while new builder grade crap plus a coat of beige paint will be enthusiastically rewarded.