3 ms·
> pay attention and do what exactly. Pressure politicians to at least - improve local climate. Cities experience more extreme temperatures, especially in summ
by mschuster91 3y ago
> pay attention and do what exactly.
Pressure politicians to at least
- improve local climate. Cities experience more extreme temperatures, especially in summer, than rural areas do because of many cities lacking tree shade, especially (as usual...) in poor neighborhoods [1]. How this can be done? Get rid of parking strips alongside streets, plant trees there, and build out public transport such as buses, trams or subways to replace individual transportation.
- help the local flora that does exist to become resilient - replace dying treets and bushes that can't cope with climate change with more resilient species, ban "mandatory mowing / watering / species of grass" clauses in HOAs (and enforce severe fines against anyone caught violating or pressuring HOA members to violate)
- improve local emissions. Fossil cars still emit lots of NOx that are (among other effects) lung irritants [2], and all cars and trucks produce brake and tire dust that are both lung irritants and contribute to the microplastic problem. Again, the solution is to build out public transport, to ban entire classes of cars and to take care to provide housing that is near to employers to reduce the amount of miles traveled in the first place.
- improve (or create!) "safe havens" for the community at large to mitigate the impact of climate change especially for the poorest and the elderly, like public "heat/cold rooms" for either winter or summer. Not everyone can afford installing or running AC systems or is allowed to install one in their first place, or the landlord doesn't care.
- improve cities' water handling aka "sponge cities" to mitigate the effects of severe rain and snowfall events - basically, create local paths where water can pass through to become groundwater instead of overflowing storm drains and wastewater treatment plants
All of this is basic stuff that will greatly improve the lives of residents in general and help become society at least able to adapt to climate change and its associated events, and in many cases does not require approval from higher-up authorities. Hell, a lot of it can even be done by (literal) grass-roots activists banding together.
[1] https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2021/jun/29/trees-america-cities-study-disparities https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2021/jun/29/trees-am...
[2] https://theicct.org/stack/vehicle-nox-emissions-the-basics/ https://theicct.org/stack/vehicle-nox-emissions-the-basics/
[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sponge_city https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sponge_city
- apwell23 3y agogood luck fighting NIMBY to allow high density housing. NIMBY block all new development ironically by using environmental regulation. We all know building denser housing is better than expanding out. But people have all their saving tied to their house so no way they are going to vote for denser housing. There is no way to "pressure" nimbys or politicians because their voting block has to much to lose.
- mschuster91 3y agoI did not advocate for denser housing. For what it's worth: to the contrary, I advocate for strengthening rural areas - it makes property ownership possible in the first place, building out dense housing requires a lot of very expensive infrastructure, and the complete disconnect behind urban and rural life style and quality is one of the biggest contributors to the current political divide.
- apwell23 3y ago>I did not advocate for denser housing. I thought you did when you said this > build out public transport such as buses, trams or subways to replace individual transportation. Denser housing is a prerequisite for this? > I advocate for strengthening rural areas rural areas with trams, buses and subways?
- mschuster91 3y ago> Denser housing is a prerequisite for this? No it's not. Not by far. That's just to get cars out of already existing dense urban areas because as long as you take aboveground space for parking cars, you can't plant trees there, and massive amounts of cars in relatively small spaces produce really nasty local emission concentrations. > rural areas with trams, buses and subways? Suburbs can be perfectly well served by buses, connecting to train stations that in turn connect to larger agglomerations. The idea is to have a dense enough mesh so that almost no one needs a car for their day-to-day individual transportation needs. Employment-related transportation (such as farmers, tradespeople and the likes) is obviously going to need dedicated vehicles even in the future, but the primary goal is to get the 80% [1] of individual transport made using cars down to as close to 0 as possible because that's where the masses are made. [1] https://www.umweltbundesamt.de/daten/verkehr/fahrleistungen-verkehrsaufwand-modal-split#personenverkehr https://www.umweltbundesamt.de/daten/verkehr/fahrleistungen-...