3 ms·
That is interesting. I've never heard that 'immigration' was a possible cause. I know 'sea people's as part of it, just hadn't heard that spun as an anti-immigr
by FrustratedMonky 3y ago
That is interesting. I've never heard that 'immigration' was a possible cause. I know 'sea people's as part of it, just hadn't heard that spun as an anti-immigration argument.
Didn't realize the 'right' had even managed to co-opt something like Bronze Age Collapse to promote anti-immigration. Since isn't a lot of studying history, about tracking 'immigration', the movement of peoples. People move around. It isn't bad, it is what actually happens.
What would the world look like if during all of history, there was never any immigration? Wouldn't humans have died out.
"If only they had built a wall to keep out those 'sea peoples', then today we would be living as good and just Hattusas".
If it hadn't happened, would there even be a Jesus? or Christianity?
- Lord-Jobo 3y agoAbsolutely not. Without large scale immigration, a slightly important country you may be familiar with wouldn't exist at all. The one where so many of these absolutely rotten-brained zero tolerance takes on immigration become popular.
- basil-rash 3y agoCan you snake a single significant figure in US politics who has actually advocated for zero immigration? Or are you saying zero-tolerance for illegal immigration? And if so, why would that be a bad thing?
- FrustratedMonky 3y ago"significant" is the key. How these arguments go is, I find a quote, then you say "not that person", or "that isn't what they meant", or "the law is wrong, it should be illegal". If 'valid immigration' is a-ok, then why produce so much false information re-casting it as 'illegal' in order to advocate stopping immigration? https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2024/jan/11/ron-desantis/debate-fact-check-ron-desantis-misleading-claim-th/ https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2024/jan/11/ron-desant... https://www.politifact.com/immigration/ https://www.politifact.com/immigration/
- basil-rash 3y agoWho recasted legal immigration as illegal? Your “citation” is of Ron Desantis complaining about too many people illegally immigrating, nothing to do with what you call “valid immigration”.
- FrustratedMonky 3y agoWhat do you think is happening if he is using falsely inflated statistics? What is the goal of drumming up hate using false data, to rile up his followers? Is it really to promote 'valid' immigration? Wouldn't it be better to discuss 'valid' immigration, if that was in fact the goal? I think you have swallowed their dog whistle.
- basil-rash 3y agoYou haven’t any provided evidence of your claim that people are calling legal immigration illegal, or that anyone wants to prevent legal immigration. Please do so, or stop claiming it.
- FrustratedMonky 3y agoPerhaps it is phrasing. If today, Republicans are against the number and type of immigrants that are allowed in under the current law, then they can change the law. They do not agree with current law, and feel that there are situations that should be illegal. So they want to change the law, thus changing what is legal now, to become illegal. So, 'calling todays legal immigration, illegal'. I hate falling back on tropes, but this is the type of 'legal' maneuvering that was done in Germany. A lot of persecution was 'legal', once the laws were changed to make some 'people' illegal. https://theconversation.com/republicans-are-pushing-for-drastic-asylum-changes-an-immigration-law-scholar-breaks-down-the-proposal-219173 https://theconversation.com/republicans-are-pushing-for-dras... ""The Republicans’ plan is similar to both a similar rule that the Department of Homeland Security adopted in 2019 and a policy that President Joe Biden is trying to push through. I am an immigration professor and teach asylum law. I believe it’s important to understand what sets Republicans’ proposed law apart from previous iterations. The president cannot change the law, but Congress can. If these lawmakers succeed in changing federal asylum law, the law would override the court decisions striking down previous versions. Because Congress has broad power over immigration, the new laws would likely be upheld if challenged in court. "" https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2024/jan/12/whats-wrong-with-republicans-immigration-claims https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2024/jan/12/whats-... https://prospect.org/politics/2024-01-05-republicans-immigration-policy-fight/ https://prospect.org/politics/2024-01-05-republicans-immigra... https://www.npr.org/2023/12/13/1218935981/republican-candidates-immigration https://www.npr.org/2023/12/13/1218935981/republican-candida...