3 ms·
Excellent summary. I’d also mention the lack of a control group. We’re supposed to conclude that it’s easier to (eventually) get fraudulent results published in
by foldr 3y ago
Excellent summary. I’d also mention the lack of a control group. We’re supposed to conclude that it’s easier to (eventually) get fraudulent results published in so-called ‘grievance’ fields than it is in (say) physics. But the hoax authors never made any effort to publish fraudulent results in those fields, so we can’t know if the percentage of papers that were eventually accepted would have been lower or not.
- jballer 3y agoWe were typing at the same time - see my other comment (sibling to yours) linking to Thiel arguing things are likely worse in hard sciences, and encouraging people to find ways to expose it.