3 ms·
I would be very peed off, if I knew. That's like order burger from big bapas and getting McRib served. It's fraud in my eye, but legal.. if I go to a restauran
by theGeatZhopa 3y ago
I would be very peed off, if I knew.
That's like order burger from big bapas and getting McRib served. It's fraud in my eye, but legal.. if I go to a restaurant by name the great still the first time, I don't know if it's chili's pizza pasta chain restaurant. Upon knowing, I would not go there a second Time.
What they're doing is harm the experience of app usages. If I would be door dash I'd sue the Frack out the party.
- redserk 3y agoDoorDash and others have known about these for years. At this point there’s no way they aren’t complicit. These ghost kitchens bloat up the list of restaurants for user choice probably making people think more food is available.
- theGeatZhopa 3y agoYes you're right here. It comes handy for DoorDash to have a blown up restaurant list. But only 'till a certain level. More than that might be the end of DoorDash. If found users think like "is this fake, again?" each time they're about to use it, and certainly stop to use it at all. The same for the paying customers. They may stop to use it because of the bad image or, just a concentrated action organized by the competition, can mean 'ima out'
- eszed 3y agoThey're more than complicit. Either DoorDash or UberEats (I can't remember which; maybe both do) tries to persuade restaurants to license their brand to ghost kitchens run by the delivery company. Source: Been on those calls.